Academia

>

Academia

Curriculum Vitae

Academic Vitae

Manuscripts

(201x) Report on Bayesian Argumentation Workshop, Lund, October 22-23, 2010. The Reasoner (forthcoming).
(201x). Arguers as Strategists. Manuscript.
(201x). On Empirically Investigating the Conventional Validity of the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Manuscript.
(201x). On Some Recent Developments in Normative Pragmatics. -- extended version.
(201x). with Peter Gaerdenfors. Theory Change as Dimensional Change. Manuscript.
(201x) with Tom Fischer. Bibliography of Conductive Arguments. Manuscript.
(201x). Review of Eemeren, F.H. van, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2009). Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness. Amsterdam: Springer. Cogency 3 (forthcoming).
(201x). Deduction, Induction, Conduction. An Attempt at Unifying Natural Language Argument Structures. Special Issue of Informal Logic on Conductive Argument (forthcoming).
(201x). Explanatory Coherence? Optimistic Induction at the Cost of Mysticism (under review) -- revised version.
(201x). From Features via Frames to Spaces. Modeling Scientific Conceptual Change without Incommensurability or Aprioricity. In: Gamerschlag, T., D. Gerland, R. Osswald & W. Petersen (eds). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Concept Types and Frames in Language Cognition and Science (CTF09). Duesseldorf (forthcoming).
(201x). with Peter Gärdenfors. Using Conceptual Spaces to Model the Dynamics of Empirical Theories. In: Olsson, E.J.& S. Enquist (eds). Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science-Series). Berlin: Springer (forthcoming).
(2010b). Entries: AGM; Deduction; Dilemma. In: Russo, F. & J. Williamson (eds). Key Terms in Logic. London: Continuum Books (ISBN: 978-1-847-06114-0).
(2010a). Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A Case Study of the 2007 Majority Opinion of the German National Ethics Council Regarding an Amendment of the Stem Cell Law. Informal Logic 30, 62-91.
(2009f). Review of F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (eds) (2008). Controversy and Confrontation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Informal Logic 29, 449-479.
(2009e). Treating Kuhn’s Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg (2009). Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Cogency 1, 149-182.

(2009d). The Importance of Being Eurotrash. Practical Advice on EU Frontier Worker Regulations and Benefits. LuPod (Lund University Postdoc Forum).

(2009c). Commentary on J. Plug’s “Telling Examples. Strategic Maneuvering in Plenary Debates in the European Parliament”. In: Ritola, J. (ed). Proceedings of the 8th Int. Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), Windsor, ON, June 2009 (CD ROM).

(2009b). Reconstructive Charity, Soundness and the RSA-Criteria of Good Argumentation. In: Ritola, J. (ed). Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), Windsor, ON, Canada (CD ROM). -- Appendix -- Commentary by F. Paglieri.

(2009a). Ceteris Paribus in Conservative Belief Revision (Ph.D. Thesis, Hamburg 2007). Berlin: Peter Lang (ISBN 978-3-631-57283-2).

(2008d). Translation [ENGL > GER] of: Tindale, C. (2008). Fallacy Studies in the North-American Tradition (unpublished manuscript).

(2008c). Argumentationstheorie. Lecture Scripts, Ruhr-University Bochum.

(2008b). Translation [GER > ENG] of: Wohlrapp, H (2008). The Pro- and Contra-Discussion. A Critique of Trudy Govier’s 'Conductive Argument' (unpublished manuscript).

(2007c). Complexity without Insight. Ceteris Paribus Clauses in Conductive Argumentation. In: Jacobs, S (ed.) Concerning Argument. Washington: National Communication Association (Proceedings of the 2007 NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Alta, Utah), 810-818.

(2007b). Pragma-Dialectic’s Necessary Conditions for a Critical Discussion. Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), Windsor 2007 (CD ROM).

(2007a). Changes in Conduct-Rules and Ten Commandments: Pragma-Dialectics 1984 vs. 2004. In: F.H. van Eemeren (et al.) (eds). Proceedings of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), Amsterdam 2006, 1581-1589.

(2006b). Lakatos’ Challenge? Auxiliary Hypotheses and Non-Monotonous Inference. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37, 405-415.

(2006a). Monotonicity and Reasoning with Exceptions. Argumentation 20, 227-236.

(2002) The Etymological Argument. Fallacy or Sound Move? (MA Thesis, Amsterdam 2002) Munich: GRIN Publishing GmbH (ISBN 978-3-638-14401-8).

As of 2011, I am researcher at the University of Lund, Sweden, Departments of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR). Until June 2011, I will be at the Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland.

My postdoc project (2008-10) applied Gärdenfors' Conceptual Spaces and Olsson's model of Agenda-Driven Change to theory-dynamical processes in the empirical sciences. It was funded by the Swedish Research Council.

I am book review editor (2009, with Juho Ritola, Turku) and associate editor (2010) of Cogency, a member on the Editorial Board of Topoi (2011), treasurer of the Lund Philosophical Society (2009) and a founding member of the Lund Postdoc Society (2008).

My PhD in Philosophy is from the University of Hamburg, Germany, the MA degree in Discourse and Argumentation Studies from the International School for Humanities and Social Sciences in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Please write to: mail[at]frankzenker.de

Links

Department page
Facebook profile
Topoi - An International Review of Philosophy
Cogency - Journal of Reasongin and Argumentation
Steven Patterson's RAIL Blog

European Epistemology Network (EEN) Conference, Lund, March 17-18, 2011
Copenhagen-Lund Workshops in Social Epistemology, 2010-11

Bayesian Argumentation Workshop, Lund, October 22-23, 2010

E-Colloq on Argumentation

Since Oct 2010
See stats for Oct 2009-10